Is Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Fading into Oblivion from India’s Public Consciousness?

On Friday, the entire country marked yet another birth anniversary of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, a personality once capable of stirring millions of hearts with a single call to action. Yet the day of his birth anniversary passed with fading silence. Apart from a handful of television debates, a few newspaper columns tucked inside opinion pages, and scattered posts on social media, Netaji barely featured in the national conversation.

At times of breathless breaking news and round-the-clock commentary, the relative silence was striking. It definitely raised an uncomfortable question: Has one of India’s most uncompromising freedom fighters faded into near-oblivion in the 21st century, not just in media coverage but in public imagination itself?

It is definitely not a debate to argue whether Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose has been totally forgotten or not. Even to this day, his portrait hangs in government offices, his name adorns roads and airports, and his slogans are invoked ‘ceremonially’ on national days. But what’s concerning is that the remembrance has increasingly become ritualistic rather than reflective.

While anniversaries of other leaders often trigger extended prime-time discussions, Netaji’s legacy appears to surface briefly, only to be submerged again under the weight of daily political spectacle. The fact that only a few media houses found space to meaningfully engage with his ideas on Friday is symptomatic of a deeper malaise.

Netaji could never be comprehended as a comfortable figure for often simplistic narratives. Unlike popular leaders of the country who fit neatly into designated ideological boxes, Bose had always been fiercely independent in both his ideologies and his actions. He took on the British Empire not just with mere moral resistance, but with an organised and full-blown military organisation that was backed with international diplomacy and an undying belief that the freedom of the nation was not something that had to be begged for from the colonial powers, but instead seized with might and unity.

Bose is often known for his unwavering efforts to prove himself an ideal leader, his leadership of the Indian National Army (INA), his victory call for “Delhi Chalo,” and his ever-adamant stand on complete independence, which sets him visibly apart even within the national freedom movement.

Today, the modern media sustains itself on urgency and conflict. Historical reflection, especially on personalities as layered as Netaji, requires ample amounts of time, contextual depth, and above all, intellectual honesty. These are probably the commodities that are increasingly becoming short in supply.

It is often more convenient to marginalise history to familiar tropes than to revisit the past and ask uncomfortable questions like, why was Bose marginalised within the Congress leadership? Why do declassified files still raise more questions than answers about his disappearance? And why does his vision of a strong, socially just, and united India remain selectively quoted rather than fully debated?

The fading media attention and lack of any significant celebrations across the country also reflect a generational shift. For young Indians, or the Gen-Zs, Netaji’s existence is more as a mere chapter in a history textbook rather than as a living idea of sacrifice and valour. His speeches are rarely discussed in classrooms beyond their historical significance. His emphasis on discipline, sacrifice, and national unity appears almost austere in an age driven by individualism and instant gratification. The ideals he stood for—selflessness, collective struggle, and uncompromising patriotism—do not easily align with the influencer-driven culture of the 21st century.

Yet, the irony is stark. At such turbulent times when the country is grappling with critical questions related to national identity, social cohesion, and global standing, Bose’s ideas are arguably more relevant than ever. His vision of India was that of a country secular in spirit, socialist in its concern for the poor, and fearless in asserting its sovereignty. His concept of nationalism was not exclusionary but integrative, which is deeply rooted in an undying spirit of unity and patriotism.

The ‘selective amnesia’ that hovers around Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose also sheds light on the concept of ‘politics of memory.’ The historical past is often streamlined and censored in public debates for serving the contemporary power structures. Eminent personalities who have challenged dominant narratives are remembered selectively, if at all. Bose’s insistence on a much-required armed struggle, his alliances forged out of strategic necessity, and his differences with the mainstream leadership complicate the easy-peasy and convenient philosophy of ‘sanitised story of India’s freedom struggle.’ Remembering Subhash Chandra Bose honestly would require acknowledging these complexities of the social structure, something that no one seems eager to do.

So, the imminent question of the hour remains… Is the legacy, thoughts, and concept of a secular social fabric of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose fading into oblivion? I believe not entirely, but definitely the man is gradually being reduced to a symbol devoid of substance. The absolute crisis lies not in forgetting his name, but the danger lies in forgetting his ideas.

In order to reclaim Netaji in the 21st century, we need more than just statues and slogans of praise. It requires serious and constant efforts inside classrooms, newsrooms, and public forums. It calls for fearless journalism and media that is willing to look beyond the ‘tyranny of trends.’

Beyond everything, it calls for the nation that asks difficult questions about the kind of ‘India’ Bose dreamed of and whether we are progressing or simply drifting apart from his vision and idea. Until then, every anniversary that passes silently and each overlooked news day will pose as a quiet reminder of the fact that a nation that neglects its most radical thinkers risks not just historical amnesia but a diminished moral imagination.

Also Read: Assam: Normalcy Returns to Kokrajhar; Internet Services Restored, Police Maintain Vigil