Lawyer Attempts to Attack Chief Justice of India BR Gavai in Supreme Court

A dramatic incident occurred in the Supreme Court of India on Monday during a session led by Chief Justice BR Gavai, who was overseeing the mentioning of cases by lawyers.

According to reports, a lawyer approached the dais, attempted to remove his shoe, and appeared intent on throwing it at the Chief Justice.

Security personnel swiftly intervened, preventing the act and escorting the lawyer out of the courtroom.

Also Read: Meghalaya: Shillong Court expected to frame charges against Sonam Raghuvanshi on Oct 10

As he was being removed, the lawyer was heard shouting, "We will not tolerate the insult of Sanatan."

Despite the disruption, Chief Justice Gavai remained composed, urging the lawyers in the courtroom to continue their arguments without distraction. "These incidents do not affect me. Let’s proceed with the cases," he stated calmly.

The incident may have been triggered by remarks made by the CJI in a prior case concerning the restoration of a 7-foot beheaded statue of Lord Vishnu at Khajuraho, an archaeological site.

Also Read: PIL Filed in Gauhati High Court Seeking Judicial Probe into Zubeen Garg’s Mysterious Death

During that hearing, the CJI had dismissed the case, stating, "Approach the deity itself for action now. You claim to be a devoted follower of Lord Vishnu, so pray. The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) must grant permissions for such matters."

Also Read: Meghalaya Government Orders New Probe into Missing 4,000 MT of Coal, Informs High Court

These comments sparked significant backlash on social media, with some accusing the CJI of disrespecting religious sentiments. Addressing the controversy in court two days later, Chief Justice Gavai clarified, "I hold all religions in high regard. The issue was misrepresented on social media."

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Central government, supported the CJI, noting the tendency for social media to amplify reactions disproportionately. "Every action now seems to provoke an exaggerated response online, far beyond Newton’s law of equal and opposite reactions," Mehta remarked.